From more than 50 countries , millions of people have expressed their disapproval of business ownership tried to plant seeds with Smog ( genetically modified organisms). That said, the companies concerned have assured the public that GM is safe and you want to believe that it is more efficient to feed the world , giving higher performance and greater resistance to extreme weather conditions.
That's Smog safer and more effective ? Are GM must really mean? A technology that makes the difference? What are the implications?
A growing number of scientists and world leading expert expert Dry. Don Huber GM, professor of plant pathology at Purdue University , Lafayette , Indiana , United States , no peer-reviewed data to support the idea that crops Smog are safe . Instead, a wide range of scientific evidence has built in recent years show that Smog are dangerous :
Through their companies public consumption of GM crops were accused of causing health problems such as allergies , cancer , birth defects and infertility , also toxicity , reduced nutritional value , environmental damage and disruption policies such as farmer and consumer disputes . Then there are the circumstances in which firms provide earnings GM political patronage. For example , the President and Congress have agreed to provide sales published on Smog (genetically modified seeds ) . Yes, people , politicians do not care about our health. You could say they are more interested in campaign donations sponsorship of the health of the company .
The effect of the revolving door
Approvals such as the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) to decide whether or not a food or drug is able to go to the market for consumption. Accreditation bodies such as the FDA, showed biased in favor of the company product trial. This happened in the case of Smog : Some people on the board of the FDA approval of GYM products have questionable later become managers of the company , who were seated in the trial of their product. Not your show a conflict of interest ?
So , in conclusion , to answer the above questions, Smog are not safe. She has not been shown to produce higher yields, increased nutritional value better than non-transgenic resist drought according to many experts , such as Professor John Fagan, winning geneticist, Maharanis University of Management, Iowa U.S. conditions .
Yes, of course , we must say NO to GM . It is driven by corporate greed and the politics of personal interests more than its fair share of second hidden intent. The technology is very dangerous and could be seen as one of the greatest threats to humanity if left uncontrolled .
What do you think about this solutions?
0 comments: